2010 mustang gt or 2010 camaro
2010 camaro vs 2010 mustang gt?—by Salvadoreno
I personally think the camaro has the mustang beat,camaro has style power and everything else,the mustang just has features,what do you think?
Answer —By ibinubu12
Camaro has more power, but is almost 900 pounds heavier than the Mustang, which takes away the power advantage. All of that extra horsepower is necessary in order to move its extra weight around. A 2010 Mustang GT with the Track Package will easily post the same lap times as a 2010 Camaro SS but will be cheaper.
Also, the Mustang is the #1 sporty car in initial quality from JD Power and Associates, whereas the Camaro already has a recall for faulty wiring (battery cable shorts on the starter and the entire car turns off).
Exterior styling is debatable, as it is with every car, but once you go inside, there is no comparison. The Mustang’s interior is made with materials that look at home in a Mercedes Benz, whereas the Camaro’s interior look like it was a joint venture between K-Mart and Fisher Price. I would not pay $30,000 for an Aveo-quality interior (that is, after all, where you spend most of your time with the car).
Camaro is flashier, Mustang is the better car.
(1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ...Enjoyed this post?
Consider subscribing to our full feed RSS. You can also subscribe by email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox.
most cars in japan are sticks/they dont have the same systems/the electrics that are responsible is made in nippon/{japan}/got to ...
Hi,
Just bought a 2000 Grand Am SE. DRL work on right side. High and Low beam inop ...
Comment by
Micheal C on 10 May 2009:
I like the Mustang a lot more. I think the new Cameros are ugly. Besides at least you know that Ford will still be here when GM goes under.
[Reply]
Comment by
C7S on 10 May 2009:
Every year the Camaro was made ever since it came out in 1967, it was always more powerful, faster, and more aerodynamic than the Ford Mustang GT, but also always a bit more expensive.
[Reply]
Comment by
Hamoncito on 10 May 2009:
CAMARO!!!! Those look way better than the mustangs. I think there are more models to choose from also.
[Reply]
Comment by
Marty on 1 July 2009:
I cant believe we are even having this discussion. For the best manual speed 2010 mustang and the ss Camaro it is hansdown a landslide CAMARO kicks butt and the prices are very similar. Think about the speed and the women CAMARO rules. The guys picking the Mustangs probably still have no shot at the ladys even with both of these cars.
[Reply]
Comment by
LivnLegLime on 26 July 2009:
When you look at these two vehicles in comparison, there is no doubt a tough decision base primarily on flash and looks.
But let’s be honest. Ford is the innovator and success story behind pony cars, and the Mustang created the craze back in 1964-65. Camaro wasn’t even thought of yet. As far as performance…I always go with facts
Cut and paste, and you’ll see the truth behind the comparison. It’s shameful how Camaro is touted and you are proud of it too. Here’s one fact for yak, the Camaro was canceled in 2002, why? Look that up. Mustang has never fallen from lack of enthusiastic purchasers. Says a lot don’t ya think.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/112_0903_2010_chevrolet_camaro_ss_vs_2009_dodge_challenger_rt_vs_2010_ford_mustang_gt/specs_and_road_test_data.html
Either way you tip the scales, Mustang is the most performance for its value. Consider also, that Mustang runs on 87 octane due to the most efficient V8 ever @ 19.5 average mile per gallon, Camaro 17 mpg. Camaro will have to run on 92, just a little more nickels that add up over the years. So read the facts before you make accusations that your intelligence can’t support.
Also, if picking up a woman is a factor for buying either of these cars, I don’t think you’ll have an issue. Maybe what you need to do is look in the mirror, because what your telling me is if you can’t pick up a girl with a hot car you’ve wasted your money. you’ll be broke and bankrupt with that type of financial irresponsibility.
[Reply]