<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 mustang gt or 2010 camaro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://autosfans.com/2010-mustang-gt-or-2010-camaro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://autosfans.com/2010-mustang-gt-or-2010-camaro/</link>
	<description>Autos Fans&#124; New Autos, Used Cars, Auto Show, News &#38; Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:43:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LivnLegLime</title>
		<link>http://autosfans.com/2010-mustang-gt-or-2010-camaro/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>LivnLegLime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autosfans.com/?p=202#comment-660</guid>
		<description>When you look at these two vehicles in comparison, there is no doubt a tough decision base primarily on flash and looks.
But let&#039;s be honest.  Ford is the innovator and success story behind pony cars, and the Mustang created the craze back in 1964-65.  Camaro wasn&#039;t even thought of yet.  As far as performance...I always go with facts
Cut and paste, and you&#039;ll see the truth behind the comparison.  It&#039;s shameful how Camaro is touted and you are proud of it too.  Here&#039;s one fact for yak, the Camaro was canceled in 2002, why?  Look that up.  Mustang has never fallen from lack of enthusiastic purchasers. Says a lot don&#039;t ya think.  

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/112_0903_2010_chevrolet_camaro_ss_vs_2009_dodge_challenger_rt_vs_2010_ford_mustang_gt/specs_and_road_test_data.html 

Either way you tip the scales, Mustang is the most performance for its value.  Consider also, that Mustang runs on 87 octane due to the most efficient V8 ever @ 19.5 average mile per gallon, Camaro 17 mpg.  Camaro will have to run on 92, just a little more nickels that add up over the years.  So read the facts before you make accusations that your intelligence can&#039;t support.  

Also, if picking up a woman is a factor for buying either of these cars, I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll have an issue.  Maybe what you need to do is look in the mirror, because what your telling me is if you can&#039;t pick up a girl with a hot car you&#039;ve wasted your money.  you&#039;ll be broke and bankrupt with that type of financial irresponsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you look at these two vehicles in comparison, there is no doubt a tough decision base primarily on flash and looks.<br />
But let&#8217;s be honest.  Ford is the innovator and success story behind pony cars, and the Mustang created the craze back in 1964-65.  Camaro wasn&#8217;t even thought of yet.  As far as performance&#8230;I always go with facts<br />
Cut and paste, and you&#8217;ll see the truth behind the comparison.  It&#8217;s shameful how Camaro is touted and you are proud of it too.  Here&#8217;s one fact for yak, the Camaro was canceled in 2002, why?  Look that up.  Mustang has never fallen from lack of enthusiastic purchasers. Says a lot don&#8217;t ya think.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/112_0903_2010_chevrolet_camaro_ss_vs_2009_dodge_challenger_rt_vs_2010_ford_mustang_gt/specs_and_road_test_data.html"  rel="nofollow">http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/112_0903_2010_chevrolet_camaro_ss_vs_2009_dodge_challenger_rt_vs_2010_ford_mustang_gt/specs_and_road_test_data.html</a> </p>
<p>Either way you tip the scales, Mustang is the most performance for its value.  Consider also, that Mustang runs on 87 octane due to the most efficient V8 ever @ 19.5 average mile per gallon, Camaro 17 mpg.  Camaro will have to run on 92, just a little more nickels that add up over the years.  So read the facts before you make accusations that your intelligence can&#8217;t support.  </p>
<p>Also, if picking up a woman is a factor for buying either of these cars, I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll have an issue.  Maybe what you need to do is look in the mirror, because what your telling me is if you can&#8217;t pick up a girl with a hot car you&#8217;ve wasted your money.  you&#8217;ll be broke and bankrupt with that type of financial irresponsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://autosfans.com/2010-mustang-gt-or-2010-camaro/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autosfans.com/?p=202#comment-599</guid>
		<description>I cant believe we are even having this discussion. For the best manual speed 2010 mustang and the ss Camaro it is hansdown a landslide CAMARO kicks butt and the prices are very similar. Think about the speed and the women CAMARO rules. The guys picking the Mustangs probably still have no shot at the ladys even with both of these cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant believe we are even having this discussion. For the best manual speed 2010 mustang and the ss Camaro it is hansdown a landslide CAMARO kicks butt and the prices are very similar. Think about the speed and the women CAMARO rules. The guys picking the Mustangs probably still have no shot at the ladys even with both of these cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamoncito</title>
		<link>http://autosfans.com/2010-mustang-gt-or-2010-camaro/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamoncito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 09:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autosfans.com/?p=202#comment-52</guid>
		<description>CAMARO!!!! Those look way better than the mustangs. I think there are more models to choose from also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CAMARO!!!! Those look way better than the mustangs. I think there are more models to choose from also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C7S</title>
		<link>http://autosfans.com/2010-mustang-gt-or-2010-camaro/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>C7S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 09:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autosfans.com/?p=202#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Every year the Camaro was made ever since it came out in 1967, it was always more powerful, faster, and more aerodynamic than the Ford Mustang GT, but also always a bit more expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year the Camaro was made ever since it came out in 1967, it was always more powerful, faster, and more aerodynamic than the Ford Mustang GT, but also always a bit more expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micheal C</title>
		<link>http://autosfans.com/2010-mustang-gt-or-2010-camaro/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Micheal C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 09:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autosfans.com/?p=202#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I like the Mustang a lot more. I think the new Cameros are ugly. Besides at least you know that Ford will still be here when GM goes under.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Mustang a lot more. I think the new Cameros are ugly. Besides at least you know that Ford will still be here when GM goes under.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
